vPod
I don't think I need to explain why I call it a vPod :) Any how, I can't understand why people would want to spend $250 for a nano when they can get a vPod for $300 that has 7 times more capacity, larger screen, plays video, and has a better/same battery life.
I think that the nano is too small to operate easily while running or driving. Even if you are not interested in its video capabilities, vPod is still the way to go!
On the other hand, Apple's keeping price low by taking out all the accessories that used to be standard, the charge-from-the-electric-outlet power cord, for example.
1 Comments:
I have been reading reviews in CNET and other sites. Most of them complain about two things. One, not having an FM tuner and two, only 2 hour battery life for videos.
I don't listen to FM for music, so first issue is okay with me. I don't plan to watch feature length movies on ipod, and that takes care of the second complaint. Definitely not bragging about it, but, I ordered one. Stay tuned to 'manamantha' for my own review.
It's coming in Fedex at a snail pace...
Post a Comment